Architecture Intermediate 1 minute read Updated 2026-06-26 UTC

Positive operator library

A catalog of model-breeding and code-breeding operators that improve capability, efficiency, teaching value, and user agency.

Research statusCurated synthesis Publication statePublished Reviewed byMichael Kappel Source reports3

Operator design goal

An operator library should not only list mutation mechanics. It should state the positive purpose of each operator: teach better, run cheaper, preserve privacy, increase coverage, or make the system easier to maintain.

Positive operators

OperatorPositive purpose
DistillMove capability into a smaller runtime.
Adapter mergeCombine frequently paired skills.
QuantizeMake local deployment practical.
Split specialistImprove clarity and niche performance.
Retire duplicateReduce cost and cognitive load.
Generate explanation cardImprove human learning and auditability.
pseudocode
FUNCTION choose_positive_operator(goal, candidate_pool)
    IF goal == "lower cost"
        RETURN [quantize, distill, retire_duplicate]
    END IF
    IF goal == "teach better"
        RETURN [train_explainer_adapter, generate_lesson_card]
    END IF
    IF goal == "combine skills"
        RETURN [adapter_merge, task_vector_merge, distill_ensemble]
    END IF
    RETURN [no_op]
END FUNCTION

Architecture implication

Every operator should declare its positive purpose before it runs. That makes the lab easier to audit and easier to explain.

Source reports used for this guide

These reports are preserved verbatim in the site archive. The guide above is an editorial synthesis and may narrow, qualify, or reorganize claims from the source material.