Direct answer
The source-theory review loop prevents raw reports from silently becoming operating truth. It preserves every source, compares it against current theory, labels maturity, implements useful guidance, and records rejected or narrowed directives.
Process
PROCEDURE source_theory_review(uploaded_files)
FOR each file IN uploaded_files
PRESERVE_IN_DOCS(file)
checksum <- SHA256(file)
ADD_TO_DOCS_MANIFEST(file, checksum)
END FOR
findings <- COMPARE_WITH_CURRENT_SITE_THEORY(uploaded_files)
FOR each finding IN findings
maturity <- ASSIGN_SOURCE_MATURITY(finding)
IF maturity == "rejected directive"
RECORD_REJECTION_IN_UAI(finding)
ELSE
IMPLEMENT_IN_CONTENT_OR_TOOL(finding)
END IF
END FOR
REBUILD_SEARCH_DISCOVERY_AND_UAI()
RUN_VALIDATION()
END PROCEDUREDogfood rule
ModelBreeder.com should behave like the system it teaches: sources feed the ecology, content forks into improved guides, tests fight regressions, and stale or incompatible ideas flee into notes rather than controlling the system.
Source reports used for this guide
These reports are preserved verbatim in the site archive. The guide above is an editorial synthesis and may narrow, qualify, or reorganize claims from the source material.