Objective
A personal research garden helps a person collect sources, compare claims, draft summaries, extract pseudocode, and preserve source trails without turning the assistant into an authority.
Topology
- source intake classifier;
- source quote and claim extractor;
- comparison matrix builder;
- pseudocode drafter;
- contradiction finder;
- human decision ledger.
Flow
PROCEDURE synthesize_research_folder(folder)
sources <- INGEST_AND_HASH(folder)
claims <- EXTRACT_CLAIMS(sources)
matrix <- COMPARE_CLAIMS_BY_TOPIC(claims)
gaps <- FIND_CONTRADICTIONS_AND_UNSUPPORTED_CLAIMS(matrix)
draft <- DRAFT_SYNTHESIS(matrix, gaps)
decision <- HUMAN_PROMOTES_ACCEPTED_CLAIMS(draft)
RETURN RESEARCH_PACKET(sources, claims, gaps, decision)
END PROCEDUREBreeding loop
Specialists can improve at extraction, comparison, and pseudocode drafting. The system should not silently rewrite the human decision ledger.
Source reports used for this guide
These reports are preserved verbatim in the site archive. The guide above is an editorial synthesis and may narrow, qualify, or reorganize claims from the source material.
Project evaluationsEvaluation of ModelBreeder.com v2.2 Philosophy ImplementationProject evaluation · 34.8 KB
Core synthesisThe Four Fs of AI: Code Breeding, Model Breeding, and the Teleodynamic Convergence of Mutable Small-Model EcologiesConceptual synthesis · 80.5 KB
Runtime source notesTinyRustLM Runtime Source Integration NotesImplementation evidence · 1.5 KB
Core synthesisThe 4Fs Framework: Fast, Flexible, Frugal, Federated — Uploaded EditionEmerging practice · 22.5 KB