Release evidenceRelease evidence1.6 KB

ModelBreeder.com v2.4.0 Positive-Side Implementation Notes

Release notes documenting the positive-side product direction, Cognivirus boundary, UAI memory updates, and source-report implementation decisions for v2.4.0.

Download original MarkdownSHA-256 977c59525a5dd28c4c7ca6a8d9e99bddf1fada26c5d4954a25c1be63655439c6
Raw source report

This page renders the original supplied document for reference. It has not been fact-checked line by line. Use the curated learning guides for normalized terminology, maturity labels, implementation boundaries, and safety framing.

ModelBreeder.com v2.4.0 Positive-Side Implementation Notes

This release records a product-direction correction: ModelBreeder.com is the constructive, benefit-centered side of the model-breeding idea. It should teach people how to build useful model ecologies that compound capability, improve local sovereignty, reduce compute waste, preserve human generativity, and make institutions stronger.

The public site should not become a warning catalog. Repeated cautions, pessimistic language, and negative-case narratives belong on Cognivirus.com. ModelBreeder.com may keep precise engineering boundaries, but it should describe them as fitness proofs, evaluation checkpoints, scope notes, compatibility requirements, and release evidence.

Accepted implementation moves from the latest reports:

  • preserve the plain PHP, root-extractable, file-backed site target;
  • keep /docs as durable source memory and .uai/long-term-memory.uai as the pointer ledger;
  • add a positive-side directive to active .uai memory;
  • rename high-visibility safety language toward fitness proof and adaptive governance;
  • add Genome and FitnessVector schema guidance;
  • add a fitness/novelty selection guide;
  • add a zero-dependency Rust browser LLM improvements page;
  • add a Cognivirus boundary page so risk-focused negative cases are routed to the companion domain.

This release does not remove evaluator independence, rollback, provenance, scope boundaries, or human review. It reframes those mechanisms as constructive infrastructure for measured improvement rather than as the site's main story.